10002806 J Clin Psychiatry / Document Archive

Psychiatrist.com Home    Keyword Search

Close [X]

Search Our Sites

Enter search terms below (keywords, titles, authors, or subjects). Then select a category to search and press the Search button. All words are assumed to be required. To search for an exact phrase, put it in quotes. To exclude a term, precede it with a minus sign (-).

Keyword search:

Choose a category:

Choosing the appropriate category will greatly improve your chances of finding the best match.

All files at our sites: J Clin Psychiatry, Primary Care Companion, CME Institute, and MedFair

Search materials from our journals:

Abstracts from The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, 1996–present, both regular issues and supplements

PDFs of the full text of The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, 1996–present, both regular issues and supplements (Net Society Platinum [paid subscribers])

PDFs of the full text of The Primary Care Companion to The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, 1999–present

Search CME offerings:

CME Institute, including CME from journals , supplements, and Web activities for instant CME credit (Net Society Gold [registered users]); also includes information about our CME program

CME activities from regular issues of The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry (Net Society Gold [registered users])

CME Supplements from The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry (Net Society Gold [registered users])

 

The article you requested is

The Brown Longitudinal Obsessive Compulsive Study: Treatments Received and Patient Impressions of Improvement.[CME]

J Clin Psychiatry 2006;67:1713-1720
Copyright 2006 Physicians Postgraduate Press, Inc.

To view this item, select one of the options below.

  1. NONSUBSCRIBERS
    1. Purchase this PDF for $30
      If you are not a paid subscriber, you may purchase the PDF.
      (You'll need the free Adobe Acrobat Reader.)
    2. Subscribe
      Receive immediate full-text access to JCP. You can subscribe to JCP online-only ($129) or print + online ($166 individual).
    3. Celebrate JCP's 75th Anniversary with a special online-only subscription price of $75.
  2. PAID SUBSCRIBERS
    1. Activate
      If you are a paid subscriber to JCP and do not yet have a username and password, activate your subscription now.
    2. Sign in
      As a paid subscriber who has activated your subscription, you have access to the HTML and PDF versions of this item.
  1. Did you forget your password?

Still can't log in? Contact the Circulation Department at 1-800-489-1001 x4 or send an email

| 67.202.56.112

Objective: The primary aim of this study was to assess the extent to which individuals with obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) received recommended doses of treatment and perceived a response to these treatments.

Method: Participants were 293 adults with primary OCD (DSM-IV) who were enrolled in the Brown Longitudinal Obsessive Compulsive Study, a naturalistic, prospective study of course in OCD. Data were collected at intake interviews between June 2001 and October 2004. Patient impressions of response to treatments received were assessed using the Clinical Global Impressions-Improvement Scale-patient version.

Results: Of the 182 participants taking recommended doses of serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SRIs) at intake, 112 (62%) rated themselves as being very much or much improved. The remaining participants rated themselves as minimally improved, unchanged, or worse while taking recommended doses of SRIs. These participants (N = 70) reported receiving their current SRI for a mean (SD) of 2.7 (3.2) years. Twelve (29%) of the 42 participants receiving neuroleptic augmentation of SRIs reported a response. Thirty-eight percent of the sample received the recommended number of 13 sessions of cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) lifetime. Only 24% reported completing a continuous course of 13 weekly sessions. Eighteen (67%) of the 27 participants who received a course of CBT in the past year rated themselves as very much or much improved.

Conclusions: In this large, naturalistic study of OCD, over one third of participants receiving recommended doses of SRIs did not perceive substantial long-term benefit from pharmacotherapy. Relatively few participants received recommended doses of CBT. Clinical implications