The article you requested is
JCP’s Circle of Honor and Peer Reviewers
J Clin Psychiatry 2012;73(1):5-7
Copyright 2012 Physicians Postgraduate Press, Inc.
To view this item, select one of the options below.
Purchase this PDF for $30
If you are not a paid subscriber, you may purchase the PDF.
(You'll need the free Adobe Acrobat Reader.)
Receive immediate full-text access to JCP. You can subscribe to JCP online-only ($129) or print + online ($166 individual).
If you are a paid subscriber to JCP and do not yet have a username and password, activate your subscription now.
As a paid subscriber who has activated your subscription, you have access to the HTML and PDF versions of this item.
Still can't log in? Contact the Circulation Department at 1-800-489-1001 x4 or send an email
Because this piece does not have an abstract,we have provided for your benefit the first 3 sentences of the full text.
The journal review process is part of the rich history of information exchange in medicine and science. Increasingly, peer review occurs electronically, but the essence of medical journals remains the same. We are the nexus between scientific discovery and its application at the “bedside.” This flow of knowledge is vital to the practice of evidence-based medicine and to the “end users,” our patients.