The article you requested is
Commentary: Lowering the Diagnostic Threshold for Bipolar Disorder: The Wrong Stuff?
J Clin Psychiatry 2012;73(4):443-444
Copyright 2012 Physicians Postgraduate Press, Inc.
To view this item, select one of the options below.
Purchase this PDF for $30
If you are not a paid subscriber, you may purchase the PDF.
(You'll need the free Adobe Acrobat Reader.)
Receive immediate full-text access to JCP. You can subscribe to JCP online-only ($129) or print + online ($166 individual).
- Celebrate JCP's 75th Anniversary with a special online-only subscription price of $75.
If you are a paid subscriber to JCP and do not yet have a username and password, activate your subscription now.
As a paid subscriber who has activated your subscription, you have access to the HTML and PDF versions of this item.
Still can't log in? Contact the Circulation Department at 1-800-489-1001 x4 or send an email
This commentary argues against proposed changes in the DSM-5 that would blur the unipolar-bipolar distinction through the “mixed features specifier” for major depression. The author notes that, in the decade between the mid-1990s and the mid-2000s, diagnoses of bipolar disorder in adults nearly doubled, while among youth there was an astounding 40-fold increase in such diagnoses. According to the author, the diagnostic conundrum around bipolar disorder is perceived b the lay public as an egregious deviation from the standard of care rather than a reflection of imprecise technology and a lack of consensus within the filed about what doe and does not differentiate bipolar disorder from other disorders.